🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for further review if he has objections.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in other member states